A Modern-Day Brand Survival Guide

Today’s consumers lead very dimensional,  multi-channel lives.  The increasingly “always on” culture presents brands with previously unconsidered opportunities to reach prime audiences through  branded information made available at opportune times.  We’re talking “shifts in consumer information discovery, consumption and sharing,” more of which I can self-select, seek, or share nowadays.

Critical success factors in leveraging these opportunities include timing, format, message, tone, convenience and value.  Example:

  • Timing ~ Did I find/get the information in advance, just-in-time, or after I needed it?
  • Format ~ Was the information easily digestible and available in multiple formats? (SMS, email, direct mail, RSS, video, website, Facebook page update)
  • User-centric ~ Was I (use cases) considered?  It’s one thing to be available, another to be useful.
  • Message ~ Was it clear, easy to understand, and easily identifiable as a relevant interest to me?
  • Tone ~ Did it sound real, purposeful not canned?  (conversational, uplifting, informative)
  • Convenience ~ Was it easy to discover, experience, redeem, or try?  Did rigid stipulations block my way?
  • Value ~ Was it worth my time?  Did the brand intuit my needs? Moreover, is it “share-worthy” in this Friendship Economy?

Each of these attributes play a role in building my overall brand perception (an aggregation of brand identity points, tallied in this consumer’s mind) which may lead to brand acceptance (heightened from awareness) if found consistently favorable.  Said another way:

Sow it and show it:  A brand has to lay down the groundwork for nurturing a consumer following.  Then it has to genuinely demonstrate a concerted effort to move toward a mutually satisfying relationship.  Posers will be noted and go unrewarded.

And again, this time with feeling:

  1. The “old” ways of marketing no longer work.  You know it, I know it.  Now go sell up a radical cultural change, willya?  The same ‘ol, same ol will net an instant turn off, tune out, or delete. This is Not a desirable kind of Twitter shout-out.
  2. Brands can’t just superficially claim plugged-in status in terms of format.  A toe dip in one outpost or medium is fine–do it honestly and with self-deprecating humor.  We’re all figuring things out here. But to shallowly claim a handle or a space and then let it languish (or project one-sided sales junk), well that’s just all-kinds-of-wrong layered on top of a poor experience.

There’s a little emotion wrapped up in this post, I’ll admit.  But I believe brand acceptance–which should be part of a conversion funnel–can’t happen without a positive emotional reaction(s).  No emotion, no connection.  I forget or minimalize things that don’t click (my “clearinghouse” theory).

But there’s good news!  Assuming rational product/service benefits are evident along with relevance factors, a brand has a real chance to break through.  Can you name a brand that’s succeeding?

Related posts:

  1. A guide to planning branded video





3 Comments for: A Modern-Day Brand Survival Guide

Tweets that mention Brand success factors in new media world | Insights and Ingenuity -- Topsy.com

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nobert S. Bermosa, Jonathan Mast. Jonathan Mast said: Brand success factors in new media world http://bit.ly/c6CANQ #marketing #branding #business [...]

Tom Cummings

Hi Heather,

Thanks for linking to my post and relating some more ideas to it! As you say, nothing wrong with “toe-dipping”, but once companies are ready to dive-in, they better be ready to swim. It can be frustrating when you want to interact with a brand in a channel that they have a presence in, only to find out that the presence is more for ‘show’ than for anything else. As many examples have shown, sometimes the only thing worse than not participating at all is participating poorly — and disappointing savvy consumers who have already formed an idea of what level of engagement to expect.

Reply

heatherrast
Twitter:
Reply:

Thanks for stopping by, Tom. I wonder…for those consumers who have been disappointed by their SM experience with certain brands, how does the experience in that channel per se affect the individual’s overall impression and affinity for the brand? More so, for those consumers just venturing out into the social sphere and encountering brand presences for the first time, do poor experiences solidify their ideas that SM is all stupid and worthless?

Reply





Leave a comment





 

CommentLuv badge

Get In Touch




Recent Posts

Get Friendly







© Internet Marketing – Branding, Content Marketing, Social Media – Cedar Rapids, IA 2012 - Cedar Rapids Internet Marketing Company

Buffer